Historical biogeography of Indo‐western Pacific coral reef biota: is the Indonesian region a centre of origin?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim To apply the modern theory of vicariant biogeography to the study of evolution of the coral reef fauna in the Indo‐western Pacific region. Location Indian and western Pacific Oceans. Methods Use of taxa ladograms and Brooks Parsimony Analysis to reconstruct relationships between geographical areas. Results The analysis seems to indicate that the Indonesian region, long stated to be a `centre of origin' for most of the Indo‐West Pacific marine fauna, is a very derived area in the general area cladogram; and that most of the lineages may have originated in the western Indian Ocean, Australia, or the South‐western Pacific (probably from lineages that had remained isolated after the breakup of the Gondwanan supercontinent, or because of the movement of island arcs). A series of events that fragmented an originally widespread biota seems to be highly congruent with geological events that caused the break up of Gondwanaland. Main conclusions Contrary to several previous claims, based mostly on descriptive, rather than analytical, studies, most lineages of coral reef fauna inhabiting the Indo‐western Pacific region probably originated through vicariant events associated with, and following the break up of Gondwana. A general pattern of biotic distribution that is highly congruent with geological data shows that even if long range dispersal and sympatric speciation may in some cases have taken place, they have not probably been the predominant mechanism of speciation in the clades examined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".