Reconciling solvent effects on rotamer populations in carbohydrates A joint MD and NMR analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rotational preferences of the hydroxymethyl group in pyranosides is known to depend on the local environment, whether in solid, solution, or gas phase. By combining molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with NMR spectroscopy the rotational preferences for the ω angle in methyl 2,3-di-O-methyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (3) and methyl 2,3-di-O-methyl-α-D-galactopyranoside (6) in a variety of solvents, with polarities ranging from 80 to 2.3 D have been determined. The effects of solvent polarity on intramolecular hydrogen bonding have been identified and quantified. In water, the internal hydrogen bonding networks are disrupted by competition with hydrogen bonds to the solvent. When the internal hydrogen bonds are differentially disrupted, the rotamer populations associated with the ω angle may be altered. In the case of 3 in water, the preferential disruption of the interaction between HO6 and O4 destabilizes the tg rotamer, leading to the observed preference for gauche rotamers. Without the hydrogen bond enhancement offered by a low polarity environment, both 3 and 6 display rotamer populations that are consistent with expectations based on the minimization of repulsive intramolecular oxygenoxygen interactions. In a low polarity environment, HO6 prefers to interact with O4, however, in water these interactions are markedly weakened, indicating that HO6 acts as a hydrogen bond donor to water.Key words: carbohydrate, rotamer, molecular dynamics simulation, MD, NMR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".