MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025132836 · doi:10.1542/peds.110.2.275

Association of Antenatal and Postnatal Dexamethasone Exposure With Outcomes in Extremely Low Birth Weight Neonates

2002· article· en· W2025132836 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Judy L. LeFlore, Walid A. Salhab, R. Sue Broyles, William D. Engle

Bibliographic record

VenuePEDIATRICS · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDexamethasonePediatricsBayley Scales of Infant DevelopmentConfoundingPeriventricular leukomalaciaLow birth weightGestational ageGestationBirth weightBronchopulmonary dysplasiaPregnancyObstetricsInternal medicinePsychomotor learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Recent studies of preterm neonates have indicated that antenatal dexamethasone (ADX) may have adverse effects on cranial ultrasound findings at the time of hospital discharge, including periventricular leukomalacia. Furthermore, both ADX and postnatal dexamethasone (PDX) may have adverse effects on subsequent neurodevelopmental outcome. OBJECTIVES: 1) To assess the effects of ADX exposure on cranial ultrasound findings at the time of hospital discharge and 2) to evaluate the individual effects of ADX and/or PDX exposure on subsequent neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) neonates in whom confounding risk factors known to influence outcome were controlled. METHODS: One hundred seventy-three ELBW (< or =1000 g) neonates were studied using a prospectively collected database and hospital and clinic records. Study patients were assigned to 1 of 4 groups according to dexamethasone exposure: group I, no dexamethasone exposure; group II, ADX exposure to hasten fetal lung maturity; group III, PDX exposure for chronic lung disease; group IV, both ADX and PDX exposure. The 4 groups were compared using multinomial logistic regression or analysis of covariance to control for confounding variables. Primary outcome variables were cranial ultrasound findings at hospital discharge and results of developmental testing at 18 to 22 months' corrected age (Bayley Scales of Infant Development). RESULTS: Cranial ultrasound results as well as Bayley Scales of Infant Development scores were similar in groups I and II and in groups III and IV. The likelihood of abnormal cranial ultrasound studies and lower scores on neurodevelopmental testing was greater in groups III and IV versus groups I and II. In this study, ADX did not seem to increase the risk of periventricular leukomalacia. CONCLUSIONS: ADX exposure is not associated with an increase in abnormal cranial ultrasound findings in ELBW neonates. PDX exposure, but not ADX exposure, is associated with worse neurodevelopmental outcome in this population. These results are supportive of the recent statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics (Committee on Fetus and Newborn) and the Canadian Paediatric Society (Fetus and Newborn Committee) and emphasize that PDX should be used with caution in ELBW neonates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePEDIATRICSSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207