Optimizing the Dose of Glutamine Dipeptides and Antioxidants in Critically Ill Patients: A Phase I Dose‐Finding Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Supplementation with glutamine and antioxidants may be associated with an improvement in clinical outcomes, but the optimal dose of these substrates is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of high doses of glutamine combined with antioxidants in critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, open-label, dose-escalating clinical trial. Mechanically ventilated adult patients with clinical evidence of hypoperfusion were sequentially enrolled to 1 of 5 groups. Group 1 (n = 30): no supplementation; group 2 (n = 7): 0.35 g/kg/d of glutamine IV; group 3 (n = 7): same as group 2 plus 15 g/d of glutamine and 150 microg of selenium enterally; group 4 (n = 7): same as group 2 plus 30 g/d of glutamine and 300 microg of selenium enterally; and group 5 (n = 7): same as group 4 plus an additional 500 microg of selenium IV. After enrollment, nutrients were started as soon as possible. All patients were fed enterally according to clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS: The primary outcomes for this study were change in sequential organ function assessment (SOFA) score and safety parameters. Secondary outcomes included whole blood glutathione (GSH), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), and blood cells' mitochondrial DNA/nuclear DNA ratio (RATIO). There were no adverse events attributable to the study nutrients, and the maximum and Delta SOFA did not differ across groups. In group 2, a significant decrease in GSH levels was observed (p = .03). With subsequent groups, the slopes straighten out and the p values are no longer significant, suggesting a greater preservation of GSH levels with escalating doses. In group 2, the slope of the line representing TBARS was horizontal. With subsequent groups, the slopes decrease, and by group 5, this decrease reaches statistical significance (p = .03), suggesting a greater reduction in oxidative stress with the higher doses in group 5. The difference in slopes across all groups describing the mitochondrial RATIO is statistically significant (p = .001), again suggesting that, with higher doses, there is increased mitochondrial function. CONCLUSIONS: The doses of glutamine and antioxidants tested in this study seem to be safe and may have positive effects on some mechanistic endpoints. A larger trial will be necessary to confirm their therapeutic effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".