Identification of differentially expressed genes involved in the regression and development of the chicken Mllerian duct
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Müllerian ducts of male chickens undergo regression around day 12 of incubation, but the underlining mechanisms remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that contribute to regression of the Müllerian duct in the chicken. We first employed annealing control primer-based RT-PCR to screen candidate genes differentially expressed in the Müllerian ducts between male and female. Four differentially expressed genes (MSX2, GAL10, VCP and PLCH1) were partially sequenced. The expression of mRNA of the latter genes and MSX1 in the male and female Müllerian ducts were compared at 7.5, 8 and 9 days of incubation using semi-quantitative RT-PCR. The results indicated that both MSX1 and MSX2 mRNA was highly expressed in the male Müllerian duct at day 9 of incubation, whereas, PLCH1 mRNA was lower in the male duct at day 9 of incubation compared to that of the female duct. Although VCP mRNA was expressed in both left and right female Müllerian ducts, no expression was detected in the male duct. Whole mount in situ hybridyzation analysis showed that the expression of MSX1 and MSX2 mRNA were localized specifically in the mesenchymal cells of the male Müllerian duct at day 9 of incubation. In contrast, VCP mRNA expression was observed in both mesenchymal and epithelial cells of the female Müllerian duct but not detected in the male duct. These results suggest that both up-regulation of MSX1 and MSX2 mRNA expression is involved in the regression of the Müllerian duct in male chicken embryo, whereas VCP expression is involved in development of the female duct.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".