PSEUDOTUMORAL PRESENTATION OF A CERVICAL EXTRACRANIAL VERTEBRAL ARTERY ANEURYSM IN NEUROFIBROMATOSIS TYPE 1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) is known to be associated with vascular lesions. Association with an extracranial vertebral artery aneurysm is very rare. We report the case of such an aneurysm mimicking a cervical neurofibroma in NF1. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: An 18-year-old woman with previously diagnosed NF1 presented with a C6 radiculopathy. There were no clinical features suggesting a vascular origin for the lesion. The computed tomographic and standard magnetic resonance imaging scans showed a C5-C6 contrast-enhancing lesion responsible for bony erosion. Subsequent, magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography diagnosed the lesion as a C5-C6 vertebral artery aneurysm. INTERVENTION: The lesion was treated by endovascular occlusion of both the aneurysm and the parent vertebral artery with an initial immediate disappearance of the pain. CONCLUSION: This case serves as a reminder of the importance of ruling out a vertebral artery aneurysm with angiography when managing cervical lesions in patients with NF1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".