Gray-Box Modeling for Performance Control of an HCCI Engine With Blended Fuels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High fidelity models that balance accuracy and computation load are essential for real-time model-based control of homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) engines. Gray-box modeling offers an effective technique to obtain desirable HCCI control models. In this paper, a physical HCCI engine model is combined with two feed-forward artificial neural network models to form a serial architecture gray-box model. The resulting model can predict three major HCCI engine control outputs, including combustion phasing, indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP), and exhaust gas temperature (Texh). The gray-box model is trained and validated with the steady-state and transient experimental data for a large range of HCCI operating conditions. The results indicate that the gray-box model significantly improves the predictions from the physical model. For 234 HCCI conditions tested, the gray-box model predicts combustion phasing, IMEP, and Texh with an average error of less than 1 crank angle degree, 0.2 bar, and 6 °C, respectively. The gray-box model is computationally efficient and it can be used for real-time control application of HCCI engines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".