MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025174897 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2013.2275331

An Extended-Bandwidth Three-Way Doherty Power Amplifier

2013· article· en· W2025174897 on OpenAlexaff
Hamed Golestaneh, Foad Arfaei Malekzadeh, Slim Boumaiza

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplifierWidebandTransistorBandwidth (computing)CapacitanceElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringPower bandwidthPower (physics)Computer scienceEngineeringRF power amplifierTelecommunicationsVoltagePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper expounds a three-way Doherty power amplifier (3W-DPA) as a solution to the need for high-efficiency wideband power amplifiers when driven by multi-standard signals. The paper begins with a theoretical analysis of 3W-DPA architecture from which the governing equations are derived. This analysis enables the identification of circuit parameters for maximizing bandwidth. A comprehensive methodology was devised to address the practical design challenges resulting from the transistor nonidealities: nonlinear input capacitance, transistor package, and output capacitance. Based on this methodology, a fully analog 30-W 3W-DPA was designed and implemented using GaN packaged transistors. The 3W-DPA prototype maintained an average drain efficiency of 55% at an output back-off of up to 9 dB, over the frequency range of 0.73-0.98 GHz. The 3W-DPA was successfully linearized when driven with 20-MHz four-carrier wideband code division multiple access (WCMDA) signals. 830- and 900-MHz power-added efficiencies of 47% and 53% was achieved at 32- and 35-dBm average output power, corresponding to a peak-to-average power ratio of 11.7 and 7.14 dB, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicAdvanced Power Amplifier DesignFrench-language works237,207