MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025198153 · doi:10.1029/2000ja003020

Plasma sheet dynamics observed by the Polar spacecraft in association with substorm onsets

2001· article· en· W2025198153 on OpenAlexaffabout
Petri Toivanen, D. N. Baker, W. K. Peterson, Xinlin Li, E. Donovan, A. Viljanen, A. Keiling, J. R. Wygant, C. A. Kletzing

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubstormPlasma sheetGeophysicsIonospherePolarPhysicsField lineMagnetosphereEarth's magnetic fieldCurrent sheetPlasmaGeologyMagnetic fieldAstronomyMagnetohydrodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present observations of the Polar spacecraft of magnetospheric substorm signatures in the plasma sheet midway along auroral field lines between the ionosphere and the equatorial plasma sheet. On October 17, 1997, Polar was located in the onset meridian in conjunction with the Scandinavian magnetometer chain (International Monitor for Auroral Geomagnetic Effects; IMAGE). In addition, a geostationary spacecraft, LANL‐97A, was located near the onset meridian. On August 29, 1997, Polar was magnetically conjugate to the Canadian magnetometer chain (Canadian Auroral Network for the OPEN Program Unified Study; CANOPUS) ∼ 5 hours east of the onset meridian. In both cases, substorm activity was manifested as strong magnetic (20 nT) and electric (40 mV m−1) field variations with bursts of parallel Poynting flux (∼ 1 erg cm−2 s−1), predominantly directed toward the ionosphere. In the first event Polar was located in the plasma sheet near the plasma sheet boundary, and the field variations were initiated at the ground onset. In the second event, Polar crossed the plasma sheet boundary to the tail lobes a few minutes prior to a local plasma sheet expansion. As Polar was engulfed by the plasma sheet, the field variations occurred in the previously quiet plasma sheet boundary. This coincided with the auroral bulge reaching the CANOPUS stations. We compare these two events and argue that the field variations were most probably signatures of the reconnection of open field lines and the subsequent enhanced earthward flows. Furthermore, weak flow bursts were observed at Polar in both events ∼ 9 min before the onset. In the first event, a gradual development toward a negative bay and a burst of Pi2 pulsations were associated with the flow bursts. We anticipate that these signatures, often described in terms of pseudobreakups, were a precursor of the substorm onset, the initiation of the reconnection of closed field lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207