Synthesis of SiO2 Nanoparticles in RF Plasma Reactors: Effect of Feed Rate and Quench Gas Injection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nanoparticles of SiO2 have been produced in an inductively coupled thermal plasma reactor. The resulting nanoparticles were characterized based on their morphology and size distribution. Scanning electron microscopy, nitrogen absorption (BET method), laser diffractometry and X-ray diffraction techniques were used to characterize and to measure the equivalent diameter (D(1,0), D(3,2) and D(4,3)) of the resulting nanopowders. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software FluentTM 6.1 with the Fine Particle Model (FPMTM) was used to simulate the whole synthesis process. The nanoparticles of SiO2 produced at the exit (filter) and on the reactor wall had primary particles diameter between 10-300 nm while the aggregates were of much larger size, between 1 and 4 micrometers. The simulation predictions were used to gain more insight into the experimental results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it