Role of Capsular Repair on Dislocation in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dislocation remains one of the most common complications after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). In contrast to primary THA the posterior capsule has been routinely excised to provide better visualization, but its role in preventing dislocation has been overlooked. We reviewed 69 patients (79 hips) patients who had revision THA with a posterolateral approach to determine if closing the posterior capsule resulted in a fewer dislocations. We followed the patients for a minimum of 24 months (mean 57 months, range, 24-120 months). Two (2.5%) hips dislocated. Both dislocated anteriorly in the immediate postoperative period. One dislocation was from implant malposition and the other occurred in a high risk patient. There were no posterior dislocations and no patients reported any hip subluxation. The historically high dislocation rates with the posterolateral approach can be reduced by carefully balancing soft tissues, ensuring correct implant alignment, meticulously closing the posterior capsule, and reattaching the external rotators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".