MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025256397 · doi:10.2310/7070.2003.35190

Quality of Life Following Surgical Treatment of Oculopharyngeal Syndrome

2003· article· en· W2025256397 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mireille Gervais, Dominique Dorion

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Otolaryngology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCricopharyngeal myotomyDysphagiaChokingQuality of life (healthcare)SurgeryMyotomyBlepharoplastyDroolingPerioperativeGeneral surgeryEsophagusEyelidAchalasia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oculopharyngeal syndrome is a hereditary disease mostly affecting French Canadians. Cricopharyngeal myotomy and blepharoplasty are commonly performed on these patients. We reviewed the files of 20 patients who underwent these procedures between June 1986 and June 1999. The average perioperative stay was 4.7 days. The nine patients still alive were contacted and answered a telephone survey on their quality of life. None reported postoperative complications. Myotomy significantly improved the medical domain of their quality of life as confirmed by improvement in the dysphagia for solids, food incarceration, duration of meals, and choking during meals. The psychological domain also improved, namely, appetite and interest in food. The effects of blepharoplasty were also notable. Long-term satisfaction is reported by the majority of patients up to a maximum of 10 years postoperatively. In conclusion, simple procedures such as blepharoplasty and cricopharyngeal myotomy greatly improved the quality of life of these patients. We therefore recommend early interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of OtolaryngologySame topicFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207