MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prevention of Vertical Hepatitis B Transmission by Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy

2007· article· en· W2025273111 on OpenAlexaff
Xiao Min Xiao, Ai Zhen Li, Xin Chen, Yao Kui Zhu, Jin Miao

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis B Virus Studies
Canadian institutionsIntecsea (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHBeAgHBsAgHepatitis B virusHepatitis BPregnancyHepatitis B vaccineHepatitis B immune globulinAsymptomaticTransmission (telecommunications)AntibodyObstetricsImmunologyPediatricsVirusInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Passive-active immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and hepatitis B vaccine provides a high level of protection against vertical transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV). Nevertheless, 1 in 10 children of HBV carriers have chronic hepatitis B early in their lives despite immunoprophylaxis because they were infected in utero. This study of 469 pregnant women testing positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg) was conducted to learn whether giving HBIG to HBV carriers in the third trimester can prevent vertical transmission of the virus. Of the women entered into the study, all of whom were asymptomatic, 126 (group 1) tested positive for hepatitis B e antigen (HbeAg), while 343 (group 2) did not. HBIG was given intramuscularly in a dose of 200 IU at 28, 32, and 36 weeks of pregnancy. All newborn infants received 100 IU of HBIG within 12 hours of birth as well as the first of 3 doses of hepatitis B vaccine (the subsequent doses were given at ages 1 and 6 months). In group 1, 16% of infants whose mothers received HBIG in the third trimester tested positive for HbsAg at birth and 7% at age 6 months. The respective figures for infants whose mothers were not treated were significantly higher at 39% and 23%. No such treatment-related difference was observed in group 2 infants. At age 6 months, rates of protective levels of anti-Hbs antibody were 32% in group 1 infants whose mothers were HbeAg-positive and 56% in group 2 infants when the mothers had not received HBIG while pregnant. The respective figures for infants whose mothers were treated in the third trimester were 76% and 89%. Neither mothers nor their infants experienced adverse effects related to the administration of HBIG or hepatitis B vaccine. The investigators conclude that, if all HbsAg-positive pregnant women, regardless of HbeAg status, were to receive HBIG in the last weeks of pregnancy, their infants would be better protected against chronic HBV infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrical & Gynecological SurveySame topicHepatitis B Virus StudiesFrench-language works237,207