MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025277800 · doi:10.1139/b07-043

Macromolecular dynamics of the photosynthetic system over a seasonal developmental progression in <i>Spartina alterniflora</i>

2007· article· en· W2025277800 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Andrea J. Morash, Douglas A. Campbell, Robert J. Ireland

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMount Allison University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpartina alternifloraRuBisCOPhotosynthesisBiologyGrowing seasonBotanySpartinaChlorophyllBaySalt marshChlorophyll aEcologyOceanographyMarsh

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spartina alterniflora Loisel. is a dominant primary producer in salt marsh intertidal zones along the Bay of Fundy of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, Canada, where it has a 5-month growing season from May to September. We quantified key subunits of the S. alterniflora photosynthetic system (chlorophyll, PsbA, PsaC, AtpB, RbcL) over a seasonal developmental progression to determine resource allocations and estimate capacities for key subprocesses of photosynthesis catalyzed by light-harvesting antennae, photosystems I and II (PSI and PSII, respectively), ATP (adenosine triphosphate) synthase, and RuBisCO (ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase–oxygenase). Early in the season, all of the macromolecules peaked in concentration around day 159, but then declined as leaves elongated. Later in the season, just after flowering, chlorophyll b, PsbA, PsaC, and AtpB peaked again before declining at the end of the season. RbcL, however, did not exhibit a second late-season peak, but continually declined from the early-season peak. Estimates of metabolic flux per PSII and per RuBisCO were closely parallel until late in the season, indicating coordinated regulation of catalytic turnover per complex. Early in the season, carbon fixation per RuBisCO peaked near the expected turnover rate (kcat) for a C4 plant, but then declined. The effective absorbance cross sections of PSII varied seasonally, reflecting significant regulation of antenna performance across the season.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207