MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PROLONGED TARGET DEPRIVATION REDUCES THE CAPACITY OF INJURED MOTONEURONS TO REGENERATE

2007· article· en· W2025344934 on OpenAlex
Matthew J. Furey, Rajiv Midha, Qing‐Gui Xu, Jason S. Belkas, Tessa Gordon

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgery · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAxotomyAxonMedicineReinnervationRegeneration (biology)AnatomyNerve injuryNeuroscienceSurgeryBiologyCentral nervous systemInternal medicineCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether or not it is the frustrated growth state (no axon growth) that reduces regenerative capacity or the inability of axotomized motoneurons to remake muscle connections (axon growth-no muscle contact) that accounts for poor regenerative capacity of chronically axotomized motoneurons. METHODS: We chronically axotomized rat femoral motoneurons for 2 months by cutting the nerve and either capping the proximal nerve to prevent axon regeneration (Group 1, no axon growth for 2 mo) or encouraging axon regeneration but not target reinnervation by suture to the distal stump of cut saphenous nerve (Group 2, axon growth with no muscle contact). In the control fresh axotomy group (axon growth with muscle contact), femoral nerve stumps were resutured immediately. Two months later, the femoral nerve was recut and sutured immediately to encourage regeneration in a freshly cut saphenous nerve stump for 6 weeks. Regenerating axons in the saphenous nerve were back-labeled with fluorogold for enumeration of the femoral motoneurons that regenerated their axons into the distal nerve stump. RESULTS: We found that significantly fewer chronically axotomized motoneurons regenerated their axons than freshly axotomized motoneurons that regenerated their axons to reform nerve-muscle connections in the same length of time. The number of motoneurons that regenerated their axons was reduced in both the conditions of no axon growth and axon growth with no muscle contact; thus chronic axotomy for a 2-month period reduced regenerative success irrespective of whether the motoneurons were prevented from regenerating or encouraged to regenerate their axons in that same period of time. CONCLUSION: Axonal regeneration does not protect motoneurons from the negative effects of prolonged axotomy on regenerative capacity. It is the period of chronic axotomy, in which motoneurons remain without target nerve-muscle connection, and not simply a state of frustrated growth that accounts for the reduced regenerative capacity of those neurons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it