Bibliographic record
Abstract
June 01 2015 Small Archives and the Silences of Algerian History Érika Nimis Érika Nimis Erika Nimis is an Associate Professor in Art History at the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM). She specializes in the history of photography in West Africa and has published three books and many articles on the subject. She collaborates with Africultures, where she co-edited a special issue entitled "African Perspectives on Photography" (2012) with Marian Nur Goni (EHESS, Paris), with whom she also cowrites the blog FOTOTA, dedicated to Research on Photography in Africa (http://fotota.hypotheses.org/). nimis.erika@uqam.ca Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information Érika Nimis Erika Nimis is an Associate Professor in Art History at the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM). She specializes in the history of photography in West Africa and has published three books and many articles on the subject. She collaborates with Africultures, where she co-edited a special issue entitled "African Perspectives on Photography" (2012) with Marian Nur Goni (EHESS, Paris), with whom she also cowrites the blog FOTOTA, dedicated to Research on Photography in Africa (http://fotota.hypotheses.org/). nimis.erika@uqam.ca Online Issn: 1937-2108 Print Issn: 0001-9933 © 2015 by the Regents of the University of California.2015 African Arts (2015) 48 (2): 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1162/AFAR_a_00218 Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation Érika Nimis; Small Archives and the Silences of Algerian History. African Arts 2015; 48 (2): 26–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/AFAR_a_00218 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsAfrican Arts Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 2015 by the Regents of the University of California.2015 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".