MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025377524 · doi:10.1137/s003614290139559x

Optimal Schwarz Waveform Relaxation for the One Dimensional Wave Equation

2003· article· en· W2025377524 on OpenAlexaff
Martin J. Gander, Laurence Halpern, Frédéric Nataf

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDiscretizationMathematicsPiecewiseSchwarz alternating methodWaveformRelaxation (psychology)Convergence (economics)Interval (graph theory)Dimension (graph theory)Domain decomposition methodsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisAlgorithmMathematical optimizationFinite element methodComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce a nonoverlapping variant of the Schwarz waveform relaxation algorithm for wave propagation problems with variable coefficients in one spatial dimension. We derive transmission conditions which lead to convergence of the algorithm in a number of iterations equal to the number of subdomains, independently of the length of the time interval. These optimal transmission conditions are in general nonlocal, but we show that the nonlocality depends on the time interval under consideration, and we introduce time windows to obtain optimal performance of the algorithm with local transmission conditions in the case of piecewise constant wave speed. We show that convergence in two iterations can be achieved independently of the number of subdomains in that case. The algorithm thus scales optimally with the number of subdomains, provided the time windows are chosen appropriately. For continuously varying coefficients we prove convergence of the algorithm with local transmission conditions using energy estimates. We then introduce a finite volume discretization which permits computations on nonmatching grids, and we prove convergence of the fully discrete Schwarz waveform relaxation algorithm. We finally illustrate our analysis with numerical experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations169
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Journal on Numerical AnalysisSame topicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFrench-language works237,207