Evaluation of Old Netim Basement Rocks (South-Eastern Nigeria) for Construction Aggregates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The physico-chemical and engineering properties of the basement rocks from Old Netim, southeastern Nigeria were determined to ascertain their suitability for civil construction purposes. The results indicate that specific gravity (SG) ranges from 1.55 (overburden) to 2.73 (fresh granite gneiss), hardness (H) 1.0 (weathered soft rock) to 6.0 (fresh strong gneiss), compressive strength (?) 19.31 to 77.37 MN/m2 and the moisture content (W%) 0.11 to 10.12.The moderately high strength of the rocks as well as the low values of water absorption capacity are consistent with the chemical composition of the Oban granite gneiss. The results also indicate that moisture content (W%) decreases with increasing hardness (H), specific gravity (SG) and compressive strength (?) except where rock weathering and underground water cause some adverse effects on the rock quality. The relationship between moisture content (W%), specific gravity (SG) and compressive strength (?) indicates that the fresh basement rocks from Old Netim quarry are capable of withstanding heavy traffic, foundation loads and generally suitable for most civil construction works.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".