Prevalence of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension among Sickle Cell Disease Patients in AL Hassa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in Saudi adults with sickle cell disease (SCD), the mechanism of its development, and its prospective prognostic significance are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of PAH among sickle cell disease patients attended hematology outpatient clinic at King Fahad Hospital, Al Hassa, Saudi Arabia. METHODS: Doppler echocardiography was performed for assessments of pulmonary- arterial systolic pressure (PASP) on 203 consecutive patients (102 men and 101 women) aged > 11 years, attending hematology clinic at King Fahad Hospital, Al Hassa, Saudi Arabia. Pulmonary hypertension was prospectively defined as a tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity (TRJV) of at least 2.5 m per second which can be estimate PASP equal or more than 25 mmHg. RESULTS: Doppler-defined pulmonary arterial hypertension was diagnosed in 37.1% among 202 patients included in study (after one female patient was excluded) using a cutoff of PASP >=25 mmHg. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of PAH among adults Saudis with SCD is higher than that reported from the developed countries. Further assessment using invasive techniques is required coupled employing analytical study design to predict the factors that favor the development of PAH among Saudi patients are required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".