The Next Liberation Struggle: Capitalism, socialism and democracy in Southern Africa, by John S. Saul
Bibliographic record
Abstract
John S. Saul addresses the themes of capitalism, socialism and democracy through an examination of the radical nationalist regimes that came to power in southern Africa from 1960 through 1990: CCM (Tanzania), Frelimo (Mozambique), ZANU-PF (Zimbabwe), SWAPO (Namibia) and the ANC (South Africa). There are twelve chapters (three co-authored) that are divided into the following parts: Part I (Continental Considerations); Part II (Southern Africa: A Range of Variation); Part III (South Africa: Debating the Transition); and Part IV (Conclusion). These chapters were earlier published in various fora. The strength of this book lies in its indictment of capitalist globalization for Africa. One of the more theoretical chapters (Liberal Democracy vs. Popular Democracy in Sub-Saharan Africa) in Part I provides a sound critique of neo-modernization theory and its propensity to downplay Africa's deepening underdevelopment at the expense of the needs of the majority. At the same time, Saul offers a courageous and often self-critical examination of his earlier state-centric writings on Tanzania's Ujamaa and Frelimo's ‘actually-existing’ Marxism, acknowledging the intrinsic importance of liberal democratic rights as a prerequisite to socialist outcomes, and the important role ‘civil society’ may play in popular empowerment (pp. 156–157). Saul's intellectual journey begins in Tanzania in the 1960s from where he gradually shifts his analytical focus to Mozambique and finally contemporary South Africa. The case studies in Part II and III reflect this journey (with a couple of co-authored detours to Namibia and Zimbabwe). Tanzanian socialism is primarily addressed within the prism of Julius Nyerere's thought and practice during the 1960s and 1970s, and the South African case provides a veritable blow-by-blow critique of ANC governance. Saul never covers Angola, which I feel would have complemented his excellent analysis of southern Africa given that MPLA-ruled Angola is also of the national liberation ‘moment’. The prose is sharp and well written, and I noticed only one technical mistake where the names of the presidents of Nigeria and Algeria were switched (p. 252).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".