Infrared spectroscopy of acetone-hexane liquid mixtures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acetone and hexane mixtures covering the whole solubility range were studied by Fourier transform infrared attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy. Factor analysis separates the spectra into four principal factor spectra and multiplying factors. Those containing negative factors are abstract, but the spectra are real. A statistical distribution model of the molecules in the solutions rendered the factors real. From these we define the intermediate species that occur in a 1:2 molar ratio of acetone in hexane, present principally in the low acetone concentration regions, and in a 2:1 molar ratio of acetone in hexane, present principally in the higher acetone concentration region. However, except at the concentration range limits where only pure acetone and pure hexane are present, the four species are present over the whole solubility range. The IR spectra of the species indicated very little displacement of the CH stretch bands, HCH deformation bands, and CC stretch bands, although there are some small intensity variations. Most of the modifications are observed on the acetone C=O stretch band. From the gas phase position, a strong bathochromic shift of 19 cm(-1) of the pure liquid is assigned to dipole-dipole interactions. In the 2:1 groupings, the shift that decreases to 15 cm(-1) is due to the diminished dipole-dipole interactions. In the 1:2 groupings, no dipole-dipole interaction can exist, and the bathochromic displacement of 9 cm(-1) is attributed to van der Waals interactions. In the one acetone to two hexanes grouping, no dipole-dipole interaction can exist, and the bathochromic displacement of 9 cm(-1) is attributed to van der Waals interactions. From the statistical distribution of the molecules, we determine that mixtures of hexane and acetone form a random organization with no preferred association or complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".