Long-Term Use of Topical Calcipotriol in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND DESIGN: A multi-centre, open, prospective study of 12 months duration was performed to assess safety, efficacy and tolerability of topical calcipotriol in the long-term treatment of psoriasis. One hundred and sixty-seven adults with chronic plaque psoriasis who had previously responded to calcipotriol entered the study. Disease activity was monitored using the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI). Calcipotriol ointment 50 micrograms/g was applied twice daily until remission was attained. Treatment was then stopped but reinstituted in the event of relapses. RESULTS: Of the 167 recruited patients, 6 patients did not receive any treatment during the trial. A total of 39 patients were withdrawn: 15 due to inadequate control of their psoriasis, 9 due to irritant reactions, 7 due to defaulting and 8 for miscellaneous voluntary reasons. A further 24 patients either reached the study medication limit of 2,500 g or were considered to have completed the study a few weeks prior to the 12-month period. Accordingly, 98 patients were assessable after 12 months of therapy. Complete clearing was obtained in 26% of subjects, who then used the treatment intermittently. The remaining patients required continuous treatment for 12 months. The mean PASI fell from 8.1 (SD +/- 6.67, n = 167) at baseline to 3.90 (+/- 3.50, 136) at 2 months and 2.71 (+/- 2.12, 98) at 12 months. There was no rise in the mean serum total calcium. CONCLUSION: Calcipotriol ointment was safe, effective and well tolerated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".