MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025724690 · doi:10.1071/rdv21n1ab297

297 LACK OF IMPROVEMENT ON EMBRYO PRODUCTION BY THE REPLACEMENT OF THE LAST TWO DOSES OF pFSH BY eCG IN SUPERSTIMULATED NELORE HEIFERS

2008· article· en· W2025724690 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbryoAnimal scienceOvulationBiologyEstradiol benzoateInternal medicineAndrologyEndocrinologyMedicineEstrogenHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Results from a previous experiment have shown that the replacement of pFSH by eCG on the last day of the superstimulatory treatment in Nelore (Bos indicus) cows resulted in a greater superovulatory (SOV) response as compared to the treatment exclusively with pFSH (Barros CM et al. 2008 Repr. Fertil. Dev. 20, 152 abst). The aim of this study was to investigate if a similar approach would be beneficial for embryo production in nulliparous Nelore heifers. Forty heifers were randomly divided into two SOV groups: FSH Group: eight pFSH injections or FSH-eCG Group: six pFSH injections followed by two eCG injections. Each female received both treatments 65 days apart in a cross-over design. The SOV protocols consisted of an IM injection of 2 mg estradiol benzoate (Estrogin, Farmavet, São Paulo, Brazil) and insertion of an intravaginal progesterone releasing device (1.9 g progesterone, CIDR, Pfizer, Hamilton, New Zealand) on Day 0. On Day 4.5, the superstimulatory treatments (70 mg pFSH; Folltropin-V, Bioniche Animal Health; Belleville, ON, Canada) were initiated and given in decreasing doses of 28, 21, 14, and 7 mg twice a day, over a 4-day period. The FSH-eCG Group had the last two doses of pFSH replaced by two doses of 150 IU eCG (Folligon, Bioniche). At the time of the fifth and sixth injections of FSH, 25 mg dinoprost tromethamine (Lutalyse, Pfizer, Paulinia, Brazil) was injected IM. The CIDR was removed at the time of the seventh superstimulatory injection. Ovulation was induced with an IM injection of 0.05 mg GnRH (gonadorelin acetate; Gestran Plus; ARSA S.R.L., Buenos Aires, Argentina) 12 h after the last superstimulatory injection. All heifers were artificially inseminated with frozen/thawed semen from the same bull 12 and 24 h after GnRH. Seven days after the first AI, embryos/ova were recovered using a nonsurgical uterine flushing technique and classified according to IETS standards. To determine the superstimulatory (number of follicles =6 mm 12 h prior to GnRH) and SOV (number of ovulated follicles 48 h after GnRH, confirmed by CL number at the time of embryo collection) responses, transrectal ultrasonography was performed. Data were analyzed by paired t test and are presented as mean ± SEM. There was no difference between FSH and FSH-eCG groups regarding superstimulatory (23.2 ± 1.9 v. 22.3 ± 1.6 follicles =6 mm, P = 0.56) or SOV (15.2 ± 1.1 v. 17.5 ± 1.4 CL, P = 0.21) responses. Treatments were also similar for number of total embryos/ova (9.6 ± 0.9 v. 9.5 ± 1.0, P = 0.91), viable embryos (4.9 ± 0.7 v. 3.7 ± 0.5, P = 0.17), or degenerate embryos (3.0 ± 0.6 v. 4.3 ± 0.7, P = 0.10) recovered. Contrasting with the results using Nelore cows, the present study did not observe improvement on embryo production by replacing of the last two doses of pFSH by eCG in superstimulated heifers. Financial support from CNPq, FAPESP, EMBRAPA and Pfizer of Brazil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it