Effect of lactic acid fermentation of onions (<i>Allium cepa</i>) on the composition of flavonol glucosides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Fermentation of red onions inoculated with Lactobacillus plantarum S1 (starter treatment) resulted in acid production to pH 4.5, after 48 h of incubation at 19 °C, which has proven to be adequate for proper preservation. In the presence of erythromycin (starter + antibiotic), acidification to pH 5.2 resulted, which was similar to that of the uninoculated control. The bacterial population was about 10 8 CFU mL −1 of brine after 3 days for the three treatments, suggesting that in the starter + antibiotic treatment, the antibiotic effectively suppressed the activity of the starter but not the native flora. Before lactic fermentation, the red onions contained 297.4 mg of total quercetin (Q) per kg wet weight, which consisted of 58.3%, 41.6% and 0.1% in quercetin diglucoside (Qdg), quercetin monoglucoside (Qmg) and free Q, respectively. For the starter treatment, Qdg decreased to 41.8% and 18.3% at 48 and 72 h, respectively, and a substantial amount of free Q had accumulated. The fermentation substantially increased the proportion of Qmg, which may have a positive effect as fractions containing higher ratios of Qmg to Qdg have been reported to have higher antioxidant activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".