N,N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl) phenoxy] ethanamine (DPPE; tesmilifene), a chemopotentiating agent with hormetic effects on DNA synthesis in vitro, may improve survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
N,N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl) phenoxy] ethanamine (DPPE; tesmilifene) is a novel anti-histaminic and chemopotentiating agent that has a hormetic effect on DNA synthesis in MCF (Michigan Cancer Foundation)-7 human breast cancer cells in vitro and stimulates the growth of experimental tumors in rodents. In a prospectively randomized phase three trial (NCIC MA.19), 152 patients who were co-administered DPPE and doxorubicin survived 50% longer (P < 0.03) than 153 patients who were administered the same dose and schedule of doxorubicin alone. At clinically relevant in vitro concentrations that do not inhibit the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) pump, DPPE selectively sensitizes the cancer cells that express the multiple drug resistance phenotype, making them more susceptible to the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents, including anthracyclines and taxanes. Based on its previously demonstrated interaction with histamine at CYP3A4, a P450 that metabolizes arachidonic acid, and its induction of high levels of prostacyclin in the gut of rodents, modulation by DPPE of the intracellular concentration of arachidonate products, such as hydroxyeicosatetraeinoic acids, implicated in increased cancer cell proliferation and metastasis, is postulated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".