MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025769216 · doi:10.1029/2006jc003794

Retrieval of phytoplankton biomass from simultaneous inversion of reflectance, the diffuse attenuation coefficient, and Sun‐induced fluorescence in coastal waters

2007· article· en· W2025769216 on OpenAlexaff
Yannick Huot, Catherine A. Brown, John J. Cullen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColored dissolved organic matterPhytoplanktonAttenuation coefficientAttenuationIrradianceAbsorption (acoustics)Environmental scienceOcean colorRadiative transferRemote sensingPhysicsOpticsChemistryGeologySatelliteNutrient

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A model has been developed to retrieve phytoplankton absorption, a proxy for phytoplankton biomass, from observations of reflectance (R) and the diffuse attenuation coefficient (Kd) collected by moored radiometers in coastal waters, where high concentrations of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) confound conventional ocean color algorithms. The inversion uses simultaneously two forward models: (1) a look‐up table (LUT) that accounts for instrument geometry and the effect of the solar angle on both R and Kd and (2) an analytical function describing the effects of Sun‐induced fluorescence (SIF) of chlorophyll on R. Estimates of phytoplankton biomass (mostly from SIF), the absorption by colored matter, and the particulate backscattering coefficients (mostly from the LUT) are obtained by optimizing the amplitude and shape of the absorption and backscattering coefficients in the forward model to best match the observations. An equation describing the quantum yield of fluorescence (photons fluoresced/photons absorbed) as a function of incident irradiance constrains the model and allows estimates of phytoplankton absorption. Innovations include: the utilization of both R and Kd, providing good separation of the effects of backscattering from absorption; avoidance of reflectance bands between 400 and 600 nm, thereby avoiding interference from bottom reflection and CDOM fluorescence; utilization of the full emission band of SIF; and accounting for the irradiance‐dependence of its quantum yield. The model effectively retrieved chlorophyll concentration from an independent data set — r = 0.76, n = 93, with a mean absolute percent error (MAPE) of 24%; this is better than a modern ocean color algorithm (OC4V4) on its validation data set, when restricted to the same range of chlorophyll (r = 0.67, n = 384, MAPE = 51%).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207