MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025771750 · doi:10.1055/s-2007-1024205

Perkutane myokardiale Laser-Revaskularisation: Ein neues Therapieverfahren für Patienten mit koronarer Herzerkrankung und schwerer Angina pectoris ohne konventionelle Therapieoption

2000· article· de· W2025771750 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
B. Lauer, Fabian Stahl, Ulrich Junghans, Regine Kluge, Gerhard Schüler

Bibliographic record

VenueDMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift · 2000
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnginaCardiologyCoronary artery diseaseInternal medicineCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyVentricleSurgeryMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In patients with intractable angina because of end-stage coronary artery disease, transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMR) leads to improvement of angina pectoris and increased exercise capacity. However, surgical thoracotomy is required for TMR with considerable morbidity and mortality. Therefore, a catheter-based laser system has been developed which allows to create laser channels into the myocardium from the left ventricular cavity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 46 patients (38 m, 8 f) with refractory angina pectoris due to severe coronary artery disease were treated with "percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation" (PMR). Clinical parameters (severity of angina pectoris, use of additional nitroglycerin) and results of non-invasive tests (exercise-ECG, echocardiography, thallium-scintigraphy) were analysed at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after PMR. RESULTS: The PMR procedure was successfully completed in all patients. In 30 patients, one region (anterior, lateral, inferior) of the left ventricle was treated and in 16 patients, 2 or 3 regions were treated. Clinical follow-up demonstrated significant improvement of angina pectoris (CCS-class at baseline: 3.1 +/- 0.2, 3 months after PMR: 1.8 +/- 0.7, 12 months after PMR: 1.5 +/- 0.9) (p < 0.001) and increased exercise capacity (exercise time on standard bicycle ergometry at baseline: 383 +/- 151 s, 3 months after PMR: 494 +/- 140 s, 12 months after PMR: 480 +/- 151 s) (p < 0.05), but thallium scintigraphy failed to show improved perfusion of the laser treated regions. CONCLUSIONS: PMR is a new safe and feasible therapeutic option in patients with refractory angina pectoris due to end-stage coronary artery disease. Initial results show significant improvement of clinical symptoms and an increased exercise capacity but thallium scintigraphy failed to show improved perfusion after PMR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDMW - Deutsche Medizinische WochenschriftSame topicPain Management and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207