MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025808908 · doi:10.1515/zna-2000-3-409

Electronic Energy Partitioning in the Reactions of Metastable Mg*(<sup>3</sup>P<sub>J</sub>) Atoms with F<sub>2</sub>, Cl<sub>2</sub>, Br<sub>2</sub>, I<sub>2</sub>, ICl, IBr

2000· article· en· W2025808908 on OpenAlexafffund
P. Kierzkowski, B. Pranszke, A. Kowalski, Michael Menzinger

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Naturforschung A · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHomonuclear moleculeMetastabilityChemiluminescenceChemistryAtomic physicsMoleculeAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Emission spectrumSpectral linePhysical chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Chemiluminescent reactions of metastable Mg*( 3 P J ) atoms with F 2 , Cl 2 , Br 2 , I 2 , IC1, IBr molecules were studied in a beam-gas experiment. For all homonuclear targets the MgX(A 2 Π -X 2 Σ + ) emission was observed, but for IC1 and IBr reactants the Mgl(A-X) emission was absent and only MgCl(A-X) or MgBr(A-X) spectra were found. In addition, for the I 2 , IBr, IC1, Br 2 reactions, broad pseudocontinua extend from above 400 nm into the infrared. These pseudocontinua are ten-tatively attributed to the Mgl, MgBr (B' 2 Σ + -X 2 Σ + ) transition. The total attenuation cross sections, chemiluminescence cross sections and quantum yields were measured. The quantum yields are all below 5%. The results are analyzed using information theory. The low yields for the Mg* + F 2 system are explained by a barrier in the entrance channel. For other reactions the low yields are most probably caused by predissociation of the MgX*(A 2 Π) products

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.006
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für Naturforschung ASame topicLuminescence Properties of Advanced MaterialsFrench-language works237,207