Gaucher disease: Variability in phenotype among siblings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although many mutations of the GBA gene have been described as causing Gaucher disease, there is generally poor correlation between genotype and phenotype, with a few exceptions. However, most previous reports of genotype-phenotype correlation have involved unrelated individuals, who, even if they share the same mutations, are not as genetically close as siblings. We have studied 24 groups (mostly pairs) of Canadian siblings with type I (non-neuronopathic) Gaucher disease. Since most Canadian provinces have adopted similar criteria for instituting enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), the age at which ERT is begun can serve as a rough surrogate for disease severity, and concordance (or lack of concordance) can be examined between siblings. In 14 of the 24 sibling families, there was sibling concordance: either both siblings were not on ERT, or both were on ERT and had begun at roughly the same age. In these families, there was also much similarity in the clinical features of the disease between siblings. In the other 10 families there was lack of sibling concordance, with only one sibling receiving ERT (or, in one family with three affected siblings, two of three on ERT). In these families, there was also much discrepancy between siblings in the clinical features (as might be expected in a setting where the guidelines for starting ERT are relatively uniform). Possible reasons for the discordances between siblings include macro-environmental and microenvironmental differences. The latter may include micro-environments at the level of the cell (e.g. lysosomal pH, alternative substrates) or at the level of the chromosome (contiguous genes, modifier genes, neutral polymorphisms in GBA).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".