Rituximab for congenital haemophiliacs with inhibitors: a Canadian experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When a high titre inhibitor develops in a patient with haemophilia, attempts are made to eradicate it through immune tolerance induction therapy (ITI) involving the frequent and regular administration of factor, usually for months to years. ITI is successful in only two thirds of patients prompting investigators to explore alternate regimens to use in haemophiliacs failing conventional ITI. Rituximab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, which has shown promise in the treatment of B-cell-mediated disorders. We developed a protocol for the use of rituximab in haemophilia A (HA) patients failing conventional ITI or in those haemophiliacs where the likelihood of success of conventional ITI is poor. Patients receive 375 mg m(-2) of intravenous rituximab weekly for 4 weeks followed by monthly (up to 5 months) until inhibitor disappearance and establishment of normal FVIII pharmacokinetics (recovery and half-life). Patients are concurrently placed on recombinant FVIII (100 U kg(-1) day(-1)). We have placed five haemophiliacs (four children with severe HA, and one adult with mild HA) on this protocol. In three patients (two with severe HA and one with mild HA) inhibitors disappeared although in neither severe haemophiliac did FVIII pharmacokinetics completely normalize. The fourth patient had a significant drop in inhibitor titres although not a complete disappearance of the inhibitor. All four of these patients ceased bleeding following rituximab. The fifth patient had no response to rituximab. This non-responding patient was not placed on concurrent FVIII. Our five cases suggest that rituximab may hold promise in the eradication of inhibitors. Prospective randomized studies are required to determine the value of this agent in inhibitor management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".