MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025840594 · doi:10.1080/15287390802414158

Spatial Variability of Ambient Nitrogen Dioxide and Sulfur Dioxide in Sarnia, “Chemical Valley,” Ontario, Canada

2008· article· en· W2025840594 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dominic Odwa Atari, Isaac Luginaah, Xiaohong Xu, Karen Fung

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WindsorWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulfur dioxideNitrogen dioxideEnvironmental scienceAir pollutionSpatial variabilityPollutionHydrology (agriculture)Physical geographyAtmospheric sciencesEnvironmental engineeringMeteorologyGeographyGeologyChemistryMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed at developing models to predict nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)) and sulfur dioxide (SO(2)) concentrations in Sarnia, "Chemical Valley", Ontario, Canada, and model the intra-urban variation of ambient NO(2) and SO(2) in the city for a community health study. NO(2) and SO(2) samples were monitored with Ogawa passive samplers at 39 locations across the city for 2 wk during the fall of 2005. The final land use regression models were constructed to generate independent variables that might best predict NO(2) and SO(2) concentrations. The coefficients of determinations for the final NO(2) and SO(2) models were .79 and .66, respectively. The explanatory variables in the final NO(2) model were: proximity to the industrial core, industrial areas within 1600 m, highways within 400 m, and dwelling counts within 2400 m. The variables in the final SO(2) model were: proximity to the industrial core, industrial areas within 1200 m, and major roads within 100 m. The spatial variations captured in these analyses are being used to estimate ambient pollution concentrations for a large health study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Toxicology and Environmental HealthSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207