MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025848395 · doi:10.1021/es0626483

Spatial and Habitat-Based Variations in Total and Methyl Mercury Concentrations in Surficial Sediments in the San Francisco Bay-Delta

2007· article· en· W2025848395 on OpenAlexfundno aff
W. A. Heim, Kenneth H. Coale, Mark Stephenson, Key‐Young Choe, Gary A. Gill, Chris Foe

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council CanadaEarl H. and Ethel M. Myers Oceanographic and Marine Biology Trust
KeywordsBayTransectDeltaMarshMercury (programming language)EstuarySedimentOceanographyGeologyEnvironmental scienceWetlandHydrology (agriculture)Spatial variabilityEcologyGeomorphologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent studies indicate significant amounts of mercury (Hg) are annually transported into the San Francisco Bay-Delta (Bay-Delta) as a result of historic gold and Hg mining activities. We examined temporal and spatial variation in concentrations of total Hg (Hg(T)) and monomethylmercury (MMHg) in surficial sediments of various ecosystem types in the Bay-Delta. We sampled surficial sediments across the Bay-Delta system and found Hg(T) sediment concentrations in the central Delta were generally 100-200 ng g(-1) and increased westward through Suisun Bay to 250-350 ng g(-1). MMHg concentrations in the central Delta were between 1 and 3 ng g(-1), while those in sediments in the perimeter waterways and adjacent bays were less than 1 ng g(-1). Six sites were monitored monthly for over a year to identify seasonal changes in Hg sediment concentrations. Hgtau sediment concentrations ranged from 48 to 382 ng g(-1) and varied as a function of location not season. However, MMHg concentrations varied seasonally, increasing from 1 ng g(-1) during winter months to 6 ng g(-1) during spring and summer. Transects conducted at three marshes in the central Delta revealed MMHg sediment concentrations of 4-8 ng g(-1) at the interior and 2 ng g(-1) at the exterior of the marshes. Habitat type was a major factor controlling MMHg concentration and the MMHg to Hg(T) ratio in sediments of the Bay-Delta. MMHg was significantly correlated to Hgt (r2 = 0.49) in marsh sediments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.863

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicMercury impact and mitigation studiesFrench-language works237,207