MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimal design of hybrid renewable energy system based on solar and biomass for halal products research institute, UPM

2014· article· en· W2025859769 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mohd Izhwan Muhamad, Mohd Amran Mohd Radzi, Noor Izzri Abdul Wahab, Hashim Hizam, Mohd Fuad Mahmood

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Population and Public HealthUniversiti Putra Malaysia
KeywordsSizingRenewable energyProcess engineeringComputer scienceBiomass (ecology)Solar energySoftwareSensitivity (control systems)Reliability engineeringHybrid systemAutomotive engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents design optimization of hybrid renewable energy system based on solar and biomass energy resources. The optimization is using HOMER software to get the best and optimal operation system. The optimum sizing of the Hybrid Renewable Energy System (HRES) is determined based on optimization and sensitivity analyses in order to get the best combination or solution of the proposed development. The optimization of HRES considers components selected, its sizing and operational strategy to provide the reliable and efficient system. The excess energy created from the HRES has also been evaluated. It will consider on minimizing the excess energy of the HRES. Data of solar radiation and biomass resources are analyzed and simulated in HOMER to assess the proposed HRES. Overall performance of the HRES will be evaluated and finally analysis will be performed to get the optimal design of the HRES for the pilot area selected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207