Efficiency of Magnetic Alignment Found in Various Paramagnetic and Diamagnetic Solids Detected by Simple Rotational Oscillation of Sample in Microgravity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oscillation of magnetically stable-axis with respect to a static field below 20 kOe occurred for various solids without spontaneous magnetic moment. The oscillation was caused by anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility Δχ. According to theoretical consideration on the origin of diamagnetic and paramagnetic anisotropy, Δχ values of ordinary solid is expected to range over 6 orders of magnitude. These Δχ values can be obtained from period of the above-mentioned oscillation; small Δχ values were detectable because effect of restoration torque of a fiber that suspended the sample was excluded in the measurement. Δχ above 1×10−9 emu/g were detected at terrestrial gravity in a field below B=20 kOe. The fiber itself was excluded by floating a sample in microgravity, for the purpose of detecting Δχ below 1×10−9 emu/g. Alignment of micron-sized crystals dispersed in fluid at room temperature is achieved below 2 Tesla for most of the solids since their Δχ value is above 1×10−9 emu/g. Efficiency of magnetic alignment is enhanced considerably for ordinary oxide when resultant Δχ is increased by paramagnetic impurity ions up to level of 10−5 emu/g.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it