MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025898580 · doi:10.1002/app.10878

Durability of poly(dimethylsiloxane) when exposed to chlorine gas

2002· article· en· W2025898580 on OpenAlexaff
Marianne S. Eikeland, May‐Britt Hägg, Michael A. Brook, Magnar Ottøy, Arne Lindbråthen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMembrane Separation and Gas Transport
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermeationMembraneChlorineGas separationPolymer chemistryMaterials scienceChemical engineeringPolymerPermeability (electromagnetism)DurabilityChemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Highly crosslinked poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) is discussed as an alternative membrane material for the gas separation of highly concentrated chlorine gas (90–95 vol %) and oxygen, due to an initial high permeation for Cl 2 and a high selectivity of Cl 2 /O 2 . It was found that the separation properties of the PDMS membrane change over time upon exposure to aggressive chlorine gas; the flux will go down, and the material may even degrade if not appropriately prepared and protected. The PDMS was exposed to chlorine gas over 4 weeks in a glass chamber at both 30 and 60°C and analysed by (FTIR). The membranes were exposed to chlorine gas in a permeation cell with measurements of the permeability of N 2 , O 2 , and Cl 2 at regular intervals. The temperature range for the permeation measurements was 30–100°C, and the pressure difference over the membrane was ca. 2 bar. The time of exposure in the permeation cell was several weeks. The absorption of N 2 , O 2 , and Cl 2 in the PDMS at temperatures in the same range was also measured. This article discusses the durability of the highly crosslinked PDMS membrane following chlorine exposure. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 85: 2458–2470, 2002

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.662

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Polymer ScienceSame topicMembrane Separation and Gas TransportFrench-language works237,207