MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025936184 · doi:10.1139/v02-149

The neutral diradical 5,5<i>'</i>-bis(1,3,2,4-dithiadiazolyl) [-], the first main group radical to exhibit a dramatic increase in paramagnetism on mechanical grinding

2002· article· en· W2025936184 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Guillermo Antorrena, Scott Brownridge, T. Stanley Cameron, Fernando Palacio, Simon Parsons, Jack Passmore, Laurence K. Thompson, Fitri Zarlaida

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetism in coordination complexes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiradicalChemistryCrystallographySinglet stateAb initioElectron paramagnetic resonanceParamagnetismComputational chemistryAtomic physicsNuclear magnetic resonanceExcited stateCondensed matter physicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reduction of [([Formula: see text])2][As6]2 with triphenylantimony and tetrabutylammonium chloride produced the diradical 5,5'-bis(1,3,2,4-dithiadiazolyl) [[Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text]] in high yield as a black solid with widely ranging magnetic susceptibilities (e.g., 0.6 to 2.6 μB), which on oxidation with AsF5 regenerated [([Formula: see text])2][AsF6]2. The identity of [[Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text]] was established from EPR, vibrational, and mass spectra. Ab initio molecular orbital [MPW1PW91/6-311G(2df)] calculations show the lowest energy structure to consist of two coplanar rings separated by a C—C single bond (1.444 Å), reflected in the comparison of the vibrational spectra of the diradical with that of [([Formula: see text])2][AsF6]2 and the calculated spectra. Confidence in the calculated [MPW1PW91/6-311G(2df)] structure of the diradical is supported by the excellent agreement between the calculated and X-ray single crystal structure geometries of [[Formula: see text]]2 and [([Formula: see text])2]2+ in [([Formula: see text])2][AsF6]2. The molecular orbitals indicate the diradical is essentially disjoint, confirmed by a very small (0.07 kJ mol–1) GVB-PP(TC-SCF)/6-311G* calculated singlet–triplet energy gap. Accordingly, the EPR spectrum of the diradical (in tetrahydrofuran, 293 K) shows a simple 3-line pattern (g = 2.0043, a(14N) = 1.11 mT) with no observable exchange coupling between the two radical centers. Mechanical grinding of the diradical results in a large increase in paramagnetism (e.g., from 1.03 to 2.55 μB) that is unprecedented in main group chemistry. The X-ray diffraction data of the ground and unground powder are consistent with a second order phase change on grinding. Attempts to obtain crystals of the diradical by sublimation led instead to numerous decomposition and rearrangement products, including 4-cyano-1,2,3,5-dithiadiazolyl [NC-[Formula: see text]], monoclinic space group C2/c, a = 9.46(2) Å, b = 7.625(5) Å, c = 13.17(2) Å, β = 107.94(4)°, Z = 8. The structure consists of axially symmetric, co-facial, cis dimers linked to form strands through two sets of C[Formula: see text]Nδ–···Sδ+ contacts. More efficient and larger scale preparations of [SNS][AsF6] and [([Formula: see text])2][AsF6]2 are reported. Key words: 5,5'-bis(1,3,2,4-dithiadiazolyl), diradical, paramagnetism, mechanical grinding, second order phase change, 4-cyano-1,2,3,5-dithiadiazolyl.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicMagnetism in coordination complexesFrench-language works237,207