Optimal allocation of STATCOM with energy storage to improve power system performance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The production cost of electrical energy has created a need to find reliable, cheap and accessible sources for energy generation. As a result, the use of alternative sources such as wind and solar energy is in rapid growth world-wide. Nowadays these renewable energies are always combined with energy storage systems (ESSs) to save extra energy production and keep the production level below a specific limit. An ESS could also be combined with a STATCOM in a power system. This combination could add the benefits of an ESS to the advantages of a FACTS device such as reduced power flows on overloaded lines, resulting in increased system loadability, lower transmission line losses, improved power system stability and security, lower power production costs, and more secure bus voltage levels. This paper presents a genetic algorithm-based optimization process, for seeking optimal locations and parameters for a STATCOM combined with an ESS in power systems. The optimization process is designed to minimize transmission line losses and maximize the power transmitted by the network. The simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed optimization process in determining optimal locations for the device in several test networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".