MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025996849 · doi:10.1109/tap.2014.2364052

A Wideband CPW-Fed Planar Dielectric Tapered Antenna With Parasitic Elements for 60-GHz Integrated Application

2014· article· en· W2025996849 on OpenAlexaff
Saman Jafarlou, Maher Bakri-Kassem, Mohammad Fakharzadeh, Zahra Sotoodeh, Safieddin Safavi‐Naeini

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooPeraso Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsAntenna measurementWidebandAntenna gainAntenna factorDipole antennaOpticsElectrical engineeringAntenna (radio)PhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a high-efficiency wideband planar dielectric tapered antenna designed for 60-GHz integrated applications fabricated through a novel process compatible with silicon technology. The antenna is composed of five parts: a CPW line, a balun, a tapered slot line, a dielectric tapered antenna, and parasitic elements. Single antenna has a simulated impedance bandwidth from 52.4 to 66.4 GHz, and a peak gain between 8.5 and 10.25 dBi over the bandwidth. Furthermore, a two-element array of this antenna is designed using a CPW power divider with a simulated 12-dBi gain and 9-GHz bandwidth. Single-element antenna and two-element array prototypes are fabricated on high-resistive bonded silicon wafers through a novel 11-step fabrication process designed for double-sided etching. The measured results of single antenna show over 15-GHz bandwidth and 9.6-dBi gain. For the two-element array measured, the bandwidth and gain are 10 GHz and 10.8 dBi, respectively. The antenna performance is suitable for integrated mm-wave applications requiring wide bandwidth, particularly mm-wave imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207