Nasal <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Carriage Is Not a Risk Factor for Lower-Airway Infection in Young Cystic Fibrosis Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is one of the first pathogens which often persistently infect the airways of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Nasal S. aureus carriage is a risk factor for S. aureus infections in non-CF patients. Topical treatment strategies successfully eradicate nasal S. aureus carriage, thereby decreasing S. aureus infection. A prospective longitudinal multicenter study was conducted to assess whether nasal carriage represents a risk factor for S. aureus colonization of the oropharynx in young CF patients. Cross-sectional analysis revealed a significantly higher prevalence of S. aureus-positive nasal (28/80 [35%] versus 20/109 [18%]; P < 0.01) and oropharyngeal (35/80 [44%] versus 20/109 [18%]; P < 0.001) cultures in children with CF compared to a control group. The first site of S. aureus detection was the nose in 6 patients and the oropharynx in 14 patients, respectively. Longitudinal analysis demonstrated a significantly higher S. aureus prevalence (61/62 [98%] versus 47/62 [76%]; P < 0.001) and persistence (46/62 [74%] versus 31/62 [50%]; P < 0.01) in the oropharynx than in the nose. In CF patients, the oropharynx, and not the nose, was the predominant site of S. aureus infection and persistence. Hence, it is unlikely that CF patients will benefit from topical treatment strategies to eradicate nasal carriage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".