MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026036781 · doi:10.1039/b416269b

Chemical and phase composition of particles produced by laser ablation of silicate glass and zircon—implications for elemental fractionation during ICP-MS analysis

2005· article· en· W2026036781 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersGrantová Agentura České RepublikyUniverzita Karlova v Praze
KeywordsZirconBaddeleyiteSilicateAnalytical Chemistry (journal)FractionationLaser ablationMineralogyMaterials scienceParticle (ecology)Amorphous solidChemical compositionChemistryLaserGeologyGeochemistryChromatographyCrystallographyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chemical and phase compositions of particles produced by laser ablation (266 nm Nd:YAG) of silicate NIST glasses and zircon were studied by SIMS and HR-TEM techniques. The data suggest that the formation of phases of different mineralogy and/or chemical composition from the original sample at the ablation site can result in elemental fractionation (non-stoichiometric sampling) in material delivered to the ICP-MS for quantitative analysis. Evidence of the element fractionation is preserved in chemically zoned ejecta deposited around the ablation pit. The chemical composition and mineralogy of particles varies with particle size so that the efficiency of transport of particles also plays a role in elemental fractionation. During the first 250 pulses in a typical ablation experiment using a 266 nm laser, particle sizes are mainly <2.5 μm; thereafter they decrease to <0.3 μm. Pb and U are fractionated significantly during the ablation of both silicate glass and zircon. During the ablation of glass, both micron-sized, melt-derived, spherical particles, and nm-sized, condensate-derived particle clusters, are produced; the very smallest particles (<0.04 μm) have anomalously high Pb/U ratios. For zircon, both larger (0.2–0.5 μm) spherical particles and agglomerates of smaller (∼0.005 μm) particles produced by ablation are mixtures of amorphous and crystalline materials, probably zircon, baddeleyite (ZrO2) and SiO2. Evidence for thermal decomposition of zircon to baddeleyite and SiO2 is preserved in the wall of the ablation pit, and may lead to the commonly observed increase in Pb/U recorded during laser ablation ICP-MS analysis. It follows that a matrix-matched external calibration is essential for achieving highly precise and accurate laser (266 nm wavelength) ablation ICP-MS analysis of Pb and U in silicate samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it