Disruption of the blood–brain barrier during TNBS colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Well-documented central nervous system changes during colitis suggest possible alterations of blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, yet the integrity of the BBB has not been fully evaluated in experimental colitis. Our aim was to investigate whether trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid (TNBS) colitis was associated with an increase in the permeability of the BBB. Sprague-Dawley rats were given an intracolonic injection of saline or TNBS and studied 1, 2, 3, 7 and 21 days after treatment. The extravasation of endogenous immunoglobulin G, a large molecule, was not altered at any time after TNBS treatment. In contrast, significant increases in the BBB leakage of sodium fluorescein, a much smaller molecule, were observed 1 and 2 days after the induction of colitis, in and around the circumventricular organs; the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis, subfornical organ and median eminence of the hypothalamus. TNBS-treated rats also exhibited sodium fluorescein leakage in focal areas in the brain parenchyma. The expression of endothelial barrier antigen, a protein associated with the BBB, was reduced about 60% 48 h after the induction of colitis. This returned to control values by 3 weeks, when colitis had largely subsided. In conclusion, experimental colitis transiently increased permeability of the brain to small molecules through a mild disruption of the BBB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".