MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026227206 · doi:10.2523/iptc-16429-ms

Innovative Design of the Solid Expandable Tubular to Patch the Casing: Area Below the Previously Installed Expandable Tubular

2013· article· en· W2026227206 on OpenAlex
Tao Li, Shan Gao, Qiang Chen, Yiliang Li, Weiye Han, Xiuling Bi, Qiang Sun

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
FundersPetroChina Company Limited
KeywordsCasingExpansion ratioPiston (optics)CylinderMaterials scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Solid expandable tubular was widely used for casing patching and proved to be cost effective, however, when the damaged area of the casing is exactly located below the position previously applied by this technology, conventional expandable tubular may not be the choice to do the job since the tubular could not be positioned smoothly due to the loss of the wellbore size caused by the previously installed tubular. The paper discussed an innovative design of the expandable tubular to meet this challenge. Basically the new design involves putting the expansion tool outside the tubular, as a result the expansion ratio could be maximized and the tubular without launcher could pass through smaller wellbore, specifically the outer diameter of the tubular and the maximum diameter of the expansion tool were the same. The tubular could be put upon the inclined plane of expansion tool as it was delivered into the well, the expansion tool was powered by a piston cylinder and an anchor was used to fix the tubular during the expansion. In the field application, the tubular was equipped with two expansion tools at its two ends, the upper end of the tubular was cut thinner in order to secure the expansion of this part firstly and the expanded tubular do not touch the casing after expansion. After passing through the previously patched area, we used the hydraulic power to expand the upper end of the tubular and then raised the whole set of the tubular upward until it was stopped by the lower end of tubular installed last time, the mechanical plus hydraulic force were applied to finish the whole expansion, the field experiment was a success. This innovative design will further enhance the passing ability, expansion ratio and filed efficiency of the expandable tubular; preparing this technology better performance in the mono-diameter well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it