MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026247032 · doi:10.1210/jc.2002-021654

An Investigation of the Predictors of Bone Mineral Density and Response to Therapy with Alendronate in Osteoporotic Men

2003· article· en· W2026247032 on OpenAlexaff
William M Drake, David L. Kendler, Clifford J. Rosen, Eric Orwoll

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsOsteoporosis CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineMedicineEndocrinologyOsteoporosisBone mineralAlendronic acidTestosterone (patch)DensitometryBone densityN-terminal telopeptideBone remodelingBody mass indexPlaceboCreatinineUrineAlkaline phosphataseOsteocalcinBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Male osteoporosis is an important disease, with 25–30% of all hip fractures occurring in men. In a recent randomized, placebo-controlled study of osteoporotic males, alendronate 10 mg daily for 2 yr led to significant increments in bone mineral density (BMD), of a similar magnitude to those observed in postmenopausal women. In this study, specimens collected at intervals during the recent trial of alendronate in male osteoporosis, from 197 of the original 241 participants, were assayed for testosterone, estradiol, IGF-I, IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [BSAP (serum)], and N-telopeptide of type I collagen corrected for creatinine [NTx (urine)]. Together with fracture and densitometry data from the original study, relationships were examined between BMD and serum IGF-I, IGFBP-3, testosterone, estradiol, BSAP, and urine NTx, both at baseline and during treatment with alendronate, to gain possible insights into the pathogenesis of male osteoporosis. Statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05) associations were documented, at baseline, between the presence of vertebral fracture and each of serum IGF-I, serum IGFBP-3, serum free testosterone, total spine BMD, and total body BMD. No statistically significant correlations were observed between any of the baseline variables (IGF-I, IGFBP-3, estradiol, testosterone, and presence of vertebral fracture) and the BMD response to alendronate at any site. In a multivariate analysis, used to identify possible combinations of factors capable of predicting baseline BMD or response to alendronate, statistically significant (P ≤ 0.01) relationships were seen, at baseline, between BMD and body mass index, age, and prior fracture. However, no statistically significant relationships were seen between any of the baseline variables (age, body mass index, testosterone, estradiol, IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and prior fracture) and change in BMD at any site. These data suggest that among men with osteoporosis it is not possible to identify patients who would be particularly good candidates for therapy with alendronate on the basis of biochemical or hormonal markers. Alendronate therapy appears to benefit osteoporotic males equally, irrespective of baseline serum testosterone, estradiol, IGF-I, or markers of bone turnover.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & MetabolismSame topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207