Functional Quality of Life Following Open Valve Surgery in High-Risk Octogenarians
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the midterm functional quality of life in octogenarians after open valvular surgery. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-five consecutive patients above age 80 had valvular surgery with or without coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Using the Karnofsky Performance score and Barthel Index, patients were evaluated for functional autonomy, living disposition, and leisure activity by a single telephone interview. Subgroup analysis was performed on the 49 cases of isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). RESULTS: Mean age of octogenarians undergoing valvular surgery was 82.7 years (range 80 to 92 years). Actuarial survival at one and three years was 71% and 59%, respectively, for the entire group, compared to 84% and 71%, respectively, for isolated AVRs. After a mean follow-up of 38 months there were 110 survivors (59.5%). Among survivors, 66% were autonomous, 26% semiautonomous, and 8% deemed dependent. Seventy-two percent were living at home, 19% in a residence, and 9% in a supervised nursing facility. Over 90% of patients pursued leisure activities in the social, cognitive, and physical domains. CONCLUSIONS: Valvular surgery in high-risk octogenarians, can be performed with acceptable mortality rates, and provide patients with functional autonomy and an excellent quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".