MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Late Mortality After Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for a Childhood Malignancy

2011· article· en· W2026325727 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tal Schechter, Jason D. Pole, Denise Darmawikarta, Adam Gassas, Mark Greenberg, Muhammad Ali, John Doyle, Paul C. Nathan

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsPediatric Oncology GroupSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHematopoietic stem cell transplantationTransplantationPediatricsRetrospective cohort studyMalignancyCohortPopulationPediatric cancerCancerSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 4458 Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is used increasingly as a curative therapy in children with malignancies. However, survivors of HSCT are at risk for both disease recurrence and life-threatening complications beyond the acute period of transplantation. The risk for late mortality (> 2 years) after autologous and allogeneic HSCT has not been well reported in pediatric patients. The aim of this population based retrospective cohort study was to assess late mortality in children (0–18 years of age) who underwent a HSCT in the province of Ontario, Canada. All but a small minority of the province’s pediatric transplantations are performed at a single center (The Hospital for Sick Children [SickKids], Toronto). Indication for HSCT, type of transplant, donor source and survival were determined via a record linkage between the SickKids’ clinical transplant database and POGONIS, the provincial pediatric cancer registry. Mortality information contained in POGONIS is captured at the time of death in hospital, or by record linkage to the provincial mortality file. Records of all 842 children with a malignancy who underwent HSCT at SickKids between 1985 and 2009 were retrieved. Underlying diagnoses were leukemia (N=464), lymphoma (N=88), central nervous system tumor (N=60), neuroblastoma (N=167), sarcoma (N=44) and other (N=19). Four-hundred and nineteen children underwent allogeneic HSCT and 423 underwent autologous HSCT. Among the allogeneic HSCT group, 252 received stem cells from a related donor and 167 from an unrelated donor. Overall, 537 children (67.8%) survived for at least 2 years after HSCT. The median follow-up of these 537 survivors was 10.2 years, with 134 (25%) of the patients being followed for ≥15 years. Of these 537 survivors, 103 (19.2%) subsequently suffered a late death. A greater proportion of patients who underwent autologous HSCT had a late death (67/279; 24.0%) than patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT (36/258; 14.0%). In a multivariate analysis of patients who underwent autologous HSCT, males had increased risk of death compared to females (HR=2.3, 95% CI: 1.29–4.0), and patients treated for neuroblastoma had a greater risk of death than those treated for leukemia (HR=10.9, 95% CI: 3.0–40.0). Among patients treated with allogeneic HSCT, none of gender, donor source (related vs. unrelated), age at transplant or underlying diagnosis was associated with increased late mortality. In conclusion, children with cancer who are treated with a HSCT continue to be at risk for premature death even if they survive for two or more years after their transplant. Further investigation will focus on examining the contributions of treatment toxicity and disease recurrence to late mortality. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207