Genetic variation of <i>Populus tremuloides</i> in ecophysiological responses to CO<sub>2</sub> elevation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To investigate the genetic variation of trembling aspen ( Populus tremuloides Michx.) in ecophysiological responses to [CO 2 ] elevation, 1-year-old seedlings of four provenances (three families per provenance) from northwestern Ontario were exposed to three [CO 2 ] levels in the greenhouse: ambient (360 ppm), 1.5 × ambient (540 ppm), and 2 × ambient (720 ppm). Biomass and foliage gas exchange were examined after 60 d of treatment. [CO 2 ] elevation significantly increased the rate of net CO 2 assimilation and photosynthetic water use efficiency. The stimulation was generally greater in the 540 ppm [CO 2 ] than in 720 ppm [CO 2 ]. The 720 ppm [CO 2 ] resulted in a 10% photosynthetic down-regulation, but no down-regulation was detected in the 540 ppm CO 2 treatment. The 540 ppm [CO 2 ] (but not the 720 ppm) treatment significantly decreased stomatal conductance and transpiration rate in the provenances from the Great Lakes – St. Lawrence Region but not in those from the Boreal Region. The intercellular to ambient CO 2 concentration ratio (Ci/Ca) was significantly higher under 720 ppm [CO 2 ] than under the other two [CO 2 ]. The CO 2 elevations generally increased the total and root biomass, and the stimulation was greater in the 540 ppm [CO 2 ] than in the 720 ppm [CO 2 ] treatment. The two provenances from the Great Lakes – St. Lawrence region generally had greater biomasses than those from the boreal region, while there were no significant differences between them in the physiological variables. However, we did not find any significant differences between provenances in the responses of biomass to [CO 2 ] treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".