Molecular systematics of the ascomycete genus <i>Farrowia</i> (Chaetomiaceae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The genus Farrowia D. Hawksworth was established for members of the Chaetomiaceae with Botryotrichum-like anamorphs and long-necked ascomata, but the separation of Farrowia from Chaetomium Kunze has been questioned by mycologists who did not consider these characters to be significant at the generic level. The recent description of a species of Chaetomium with an aleurioconidial anamorph and long-necked ascomata prompted us to explore this question employing molecular characters. We sequenced a portion of the nuclear large ribosomal subunit rRNA gene (28S) of members of the Sordariales including species of Chaetomium, Farrowia and Thielavia. Phylogenetic analyses confirmed the monophyly of the Sordariales and the close relationship of Aporothielavia leptoderma to the genus Chaetomium. A sequence-based phylogeny identified a well-supported clade that included Chaetomium floriforme, Chaetomium sphaerale, members of the genus Farrowia, and longicollous species of Chaetomium with aleurioconidial anamorphs. A clade containing Chaetomium brevipilium, Chaetomium cuyabenoensis, Chaetomium homopilatum and species of Farrowia was inferred from the analysis of morphological characters, but this data set was found to be incongruent with the 28S sequence data. While these results are in agreement with the hypothesis that species of Farrowia comprise a group of closely related taxa, they do not provide strong support for the recognition of the genus Farrowia.Key words: anamorph, aleurioconidia, Botryotrichum, Chaetomium, 28S ribosomal RNA gene sequences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".