USE OF A PETROLEUM‐BASED BOLUS FOR PHOTON RADIATION THERAPY OF DISTAL EXTREMITIES IN DOGS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While skin sparing is an advantage of megavoltage beams, in certain clinical situations the planning target volume includes the skin surface and a skin sparing effect is not desirable. A tissue equivalent material, termed build up bolus, is used in these situations to provide adequate absorbed dose at the surface of the skin. However, an irregular patient contour can lead to air gaps between the build up bolus and the skin surface, which may result in variability in radiation dose across the target volume. The shape of the canine distal hind extremity is irregular, and commercially available bolus materials do not conform well to this region. The purpose of this study was to assess the dose homogeneity achieved using a petroleum-based bolus material, in combination with a commercially available sheet bolus, for radiation treatment of the canine tarsus. Repeated setups were performed to mimic daily treatment setups in the clinic setting, and computed tomographic scans were performed after each setup. Dose distribution achieved with a cobalt therapy machine and a 6 MV linear accelerator was assessed using three-dimensional treatment planning software. The dose to the clinicaltarget volume fell within 95% and 107% of the prescribed dose for both treatment machines, which is considered clinically acceptable by the authors. This petroleum-based bolus is equivalent to water in its photon attenuation, conforms well to an irregular patient contour, and retains its shape after positioning. Applications to other anatomical sites could be considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".