MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026463206 · doi:10.1071/rdv21n1ab139

139 NEW APPROACH FOR BOVINE EMBRYO RECOVERY

2008· article· en· W2026463206 on OpenAlexaffabout
R. Dupras, Younès Chorfi

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCegep de Saint Hyacinthe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstrous cycleArtificial inseminationAnimal scienceEveningUterine hornsInseminationCloprostenolGynecologyAnimal healthMedicineEmbryo transferProstaglandinUterusAndrologyPregnancyOvulationBiologySpermInternal medicineHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of a second flush for bovine embryo recovery. A total of 319 clinically healthy Holstein cows (247 lactating, 53 dry, 19 nulliparous) with an average age of 5.5 ± 2.5 years were used for this experiment. Superovulation was performed according to a modified method of Baracaldo et al. (2000). On Day 0 (beginning of the experiment), each cow received 3 mg of estradiol-17ß intramuscularly (i.m.) and a progesterone-releasing vaginal insert (1.9 g of progesterone, CIDR, Pfizer Animal Health, Kirkland, QC, Canada) at random stages of the estrous cycle. From Day 4 evening to Day 8 evening, the cows received a total of 380 mg of NIH-FSH-P1 (FolltropinV, Bioniche Animal Health) administered im through 9 injections of decreasing dose (from 70 to 20 mg) at 12-h intervals. On Day 7, the cows received 2 injections consisting of 500 µg of cloprostenol (prostaglandin F2a analogue Estrumate, Schering-Plough, Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada) given approximately 12 h apart and vaginal inserts were removed 12 h after the last injection. Artificial insemination was performed on Day 10 after treatment with 100 µg, GnRH im (Cystorelin, Merial Canada Inc, Baie d’Urfe, QC, Canada). Embryos were flushed from the uterus of donor cows 6 days after AI. The method consisted of using simultaneously 1 catheter (18Fr Silicone 2-way, Bioniche Animal Health) per uterine horn. Catheters were maintained in place to perform 2 flushes 1 h apart. A total of 1000 mL of flushing media (Complete flush, Bioniche Animal Health) were used, 700 mL and 300 mL for the first and the second flush, respectively. Embryos were assessed for viability immediately after collection using IETS classification. Data were analyzed using the SAS MIXED procedure (SAS Institue, Cary, NC). The mean (±SD) number of embryos collected at the first flushing was 5.87 ± 5.1, 0.92 ± 2.2 and 2.9 ± 4.4 for transferable, degenerate and unfertilized oocytes, respectively. The second flushing yielded 2.32 ± 2.6 transferable embryos, 0.28 ± 0.83 dead embryos and 1.2 ± 2.2 unfertilized oocytes. There was no significant effect of age, day in milk, or stage of lactation on transferable or degenerate embryos or nonfertilized oocytes in each flushing. The embryo recovery method used in this experiment could be used to recover more transferable embryos. The authors want to thank Dr Vincent Girard for his help in statistics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207