Effect of Physical Comorbidities on Risk of Depression in Multiple Sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depression in multiple sclerosis (MS) may be due to several factors, including the presence of physical comorbidities. Using the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) Registry, we examined whether individuals with MS and physical comorbidities have an increased risk of depression compared with those without physical comorbidities and whether they are more likely to remain untreated for depression. In 2006, NARCOMS participants reported their physical and mental comorbidities and completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD). We defined a CESD score of 21 or higher as indicating probable major depression. Individuals with elevated CESD scores but no diagnosis of depression were considered undiagnosed. Forty-six percent of participants reported a lifetime history of depression. In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, reporting any physical comorbidity was associated with an increased risk of being diagnosed with depression (hazard ratio [HR], 2.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.04–2.38) after MS onset and with an increased risk of diagnosed or undiagnosed depression (HR, 2.37; 95% CI, 2.21–2.54). After adjustment for education, participants with any physical comorbidity were more likely to report treatment for depression (odds ratio [OR], 1.67; 95% CI, 1.24–2.23). Patients with MS and physical comorbidities are at increased risk of depression, but they are more likely to be diagnosed and treated than MS patients without other chronic conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".